AI-Driven Tax Compliance Detection

Authors

  • Anumandla Mukesh Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22874941

Keywords:

Tax Compliance Investigations, Electronic Tax Filing Systems, Pattern Recognition Techniques, Compliance Behavior Analysis, Business Tax Filers, Individual Income Tax Filers, Anomaly Detection In Tax Data, Empirical Tax Analytics, Revenue Department Data, Behavioral Pattern Identification, Objective Compliance Assessment, Irregularity Detection, Audit Targeting Frameworks, Data-Driven Tax Administration, Resource Allocation Optimization, Compliance Risk Analysis, Electronic Filing Analytics, Investigative Tax Frameworks, Public Revenue Management, Evidence-Based Tax Policy.

Abstract

Research on tax compliance is often anecdotal in nature. This study addresses that gap by applying pattern recognition techniques to data from the Thai Revenue Department's electronic tax filing system, examining the compliance behavior of both business and individual income tax filers. Rather than explaining the causes and consequences of tax compliance, the aim is narrower: to establish a framework and database for investigating compliance patterns through pattern recognition analysis.

The analysis uncovers clear behavioral patterns across both datasets, with business filers showing greater consistency than individual filers. It also surfaces anomalies and irregularities that point to specific records warranting deeper investigation. This approach offers a broad, objective view of typical filer behavior while flagging outliers for targeted follow-up.

While the resulting insights into Thai tax filers' compliance behavior are modest in scope, they hold practical value for tax administrators. More broadly, the framework is adaptable to wider research on electronic tax filing compliance, helping identify behavior that is anomalous and worthy of scrutiny. In doing so, it supports more effective resource allocation, allowing tax authorities to maximize the returns from compliance investigations while minimizing associated costs.

References

1. Abedin, M. Z., Chi, G., Uddin, M. M., Satu, M. S., Khan, M. I., & Hájek, P. (2021). Tax default prediction using feature transformation-based machine learning. IEEE Access, 9, 19864–19881.

2. Alsadhan, N. (2023). A multi-module machine learning approach to detect tax fraud. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 46(1), 241–253.

3. Baghdasaryan, V., Davtyan, H., Sarikyan, A., & Navasardyan, Z. (2022). Improving tax audit efficiency using machine learning: The role of taxpayer’s network data in fraud detection. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 36(1).

4. Challa, K., Challa, S. R., Pamisetty, A., Kaulwar, P. K., & Krishna Reddy Koppolu, H. (2025). Transforming Payments: The Role of AI and Big Data in Fraud Alerts, Credit Monitoring, and Secure Transactions. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communication Networks and Computing (CNC) (pp. 1406–1414). IEEE. 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communication Networks and Computing (CNC). https://doi.org/10.1109/cnc68716.2025.11484733

5. Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, 104661.

6. Bhasin, R. (2022). Digitization of income tax administration in India. VISION: Journal of Indian Taxation, 9(1), 77–88.

7. Faúndez-Ugalde, A., Mellado-Silva, R., & Aldunate-Lizana, E. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence by tax administrations: An analysis regarding taxpayers’ rights in Latin American countries. Computer Law & Security Review, 38, 105441.

8. He, Y., & Yi, Y. (2023). Digitalization of tax administration and corporate performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102859.

9. Pandugula, C., Ganti, V. K. A. T., & Mallesham, G. (2024). Predictive Modeling in Assessing the Efficacy of Precision Medicine Protocols. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: THEORY AND PRACTICE Учредители: Green Publication БИБЛИОМЕТРИЧЕСКИЕ ПОКАЗАТЕЛИ: Входит в РИНЦ: на рассмотрении Цитирований в РИНЦ: 0 Входит в ядро РИНЦ: нет Цитирований из ядра РИНЦ: 0 Рецензии: нет данных Процентиль журнала в рейтинге SI: ТЕМАТИЧЕСКИЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ:.

10. Jin, P., Feng, Z., & Li, G. (2023). The effect of platform data quality on tax compliance in digital economy: A multiagent based simulation. Complexity, 2023, 5511572.

11. Mahajan, A., Mittal, S., Reich, O., & Barwahwala, T. (2024). Using machine learning to catch bogus firms. ICTD Working Paper 196. Institute of Development Studies.

12. Murorunkwere, B. F., Tuyishimire, O., Haughton, D., & Nzabanita, J. (2022). Fraud detection using neural networks: A case study of income tax. Future Internet, 14(6), 168.

13. Nose, M., & Mengistu, A. (2023). Exploring the adoption of selected digital technologies in tax administration: A cross-country perspective. IMF Notes, 2023(008).

14. Savić, M., Atanasijević, J., Jakovetić, D., & Krejić, N. (2022). Tax evasion risk management using a hybrid unsupervised outlier detection method. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116409.

15. Vadisetty, R., Nuka, S. T., Kalisetty, S., Pandugula, C., Burugulla, J. K. R., & Annapareddy, V. N. (2025, February). Generative AI for Advanced Recycling Processes in Polyethylene and Polypropylene Manufacturing. In International Ethical Hacking Conference (pp. 269-284). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

16. Yang, L. (2025). Predictive modeling of tax compliance risks: A comparative study of machine learning approaches. PLOS ONE, 20(9), e0331715.

17. Maheshwari, M., & Begde, P. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in enhancing tax compliance and fraud detection in India. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 5(2).

18. Muchuchuti, K. C. (2024). An ensemble machine learning model to detect tax fraud: Conceptual framework. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(6), 2276–2282.

19. Nuryani, N., Mutiara, A. B., Wiryana, I. M., Purnamasari, D., & Putra, S. N. W. (2024). Artificial intelligence model for detecting tax evasion involving complex network schemes. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship, 6(3).

20. Zheng, Q., et al. (2024). A survey of tax risk detection using data mining techniques. Engineering, 34.

21. Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2024). Digital taxation, artificial intelligence and Tax Administration 3.0: Improving tax compliance behavior—A systematic literature review using textometry (2016–2023). Accounting Research Journal, 37(2), 172–191.

22. Battaglini, M., Guiso, L., Lacava, C., Miller, D. L., & Patacchini, E. (2025). Refining public policies with machine learning: The case of tax auditing. Journal of Econometrics, 249, 105847.

23. Obizuo, C. J., Ihendinihu, J. U., Chigbo, Q. U., Alpheaus, O. E., & Okoro, C. C. (2025). Machine learning algorithms for detecting tax fraud: Application and challenges in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Management and Social Sciences, 11(2), 173–182.

24. Sivanand, R., Kumar, D. P., Nagabhyru, K. C., Natarajan, E. P., Pamisetty, V., & Kapila, D. (2025, September). IoT and AI for Real-Time Monitoring in Substation Automation. In 2025 International Conference on Computing and Communications (COMPUTINGCON) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

25. Vanhoeyveld, J., Martens, D., & Peeters, B. (2020). Value-added tax fraud detection with scalable anomaly detection techniques. Applied Soft Computing, 86, 105895.

26. Bellon, M., Chang, J., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., Lima, F., Rojas, E., & Villena, P. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, 104661.

27. Lee, E. Y., Leeroy, G. C., & Leeroy, W. (2024). Impact of blockchain on improving taxpayers’ compliance: Empirical evidence from panel data model and agent-based simulation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 21(1), 89–109.

28. Faúndez-Ugalde, A., Mellado-Silva, R., & Aldunate-Lizana, E. (2020). Artificial intelligence, tax administration, and taxpayers’ rights: Emerging issues in automated tax decision-making. Computer Law & Security Review, 38, 105441.

29. Jin, P., Feng, Z., & Li, G. (2023). Platform data quality, digital economy, and tax compliance: A multiagent simulation approach. Complexity, 2023, 5511572.

30. Nose, M., & Mengistu, A. (2023). Digital technologies, tax administration, and revenue mobilization: Evidence from cross-country tax administration data. IMF Notes, 2023(008).

31. Hernandez Aros, L., Bustamante Molano, L. X., Gutierrez-Portela, F., Moreno Hernandez, J. J., & Rodríguez Barrero, M. S. (2024). Financial fraud detection through the application of machine learning techniques: A literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1130.

32. OECD. (2020). Tax administration 3.0: The digital transformation of tax administration. OECD Publishing.

33. Maguluri, K. K. (2025). Ethical challenges in artificial intelligence. How Artificial Intelligence is Transforming Healthcare IT: Applications in Diagnostics, Treatment Planning, and Patient Monitoring, 132.

34. OECD. (2022). Tax administration 2022. OECD Publishing.

35. OECD. (2024). Tax administration 2024: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing.

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-13

Data Availability Statement

None

How to Cite

AI-Driven Tax Compliance Detection. (2026). American Data Science Journal for Advanced Computations (ADSJAC), 4(01). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22874941