Adaptive Exposure Control for Compliant Enterprise Risk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/jre0bj02Keywords:
Secure Distributed Financial Intelligence Fabric, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Financial Intelligence, Adaptive Exposure Coordination, Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), Regulatory Compliance, Risk Assurance, Continuous Risk Monitoring, Enterprise Governance, Risk Analytics.Abstract
Enterprises operate within complex ecosystems that require close tracking of stakeholder variables and continuous compliance with evolving regulatory requirements. Effective enterprise risk management therefore depends on ongoing coordination of supply- and demand-side exposures across business functions and partner organizations, ensuring that business strategies remain protected. The central aim of this coordination is to monitor exposure limits and resolve violations within acceptable timeframes. To support this, financial intelligence data and adaptive risk indicators—such as governance and risk statements—are consolidated within a logical architecture built around a Secure Distributed Financial Intelligence Fabric.
A second, closely related requirement is embedding compliance constraints into enterprise-wide risk assessments and generating evidence to support assurance processes. Assurance allows stakeholders to meet their duty of care by relying on robust controls, monitoring, evidence collection, and reporting mechanisms that keep risk within defined boundaries. To address both objectives, this work proposes a scheme that maps key regulatory constraints to their corresponding risk controls and tracking requirements. The resulting framework explicitly supports monitoring, reporting, auditing, and enforcement of controls, enabling organizations to achieve compliance with relevant regulations, standards, and frameworks.
References
1. Alevizos, L., et al. (2025). Automated cybersecurity compliance and threat response using AI, blockchain and smart contracts. International Journal of Information Technology, 17, 767–781.
2. Tabassi, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
3. Sekhar, P. C., Karri, M., Vidhya, S. S., Gadi, A. L., Lingineni, S. L., & Perada, A. (2025, September). Intrusion Detection in Smart Grids Using Deep Belief Network and K-Means Clustering Model for Electric Vehicle Charging Systems. In 2025 5th International Conference on Emerging Research in Electronics, Computer Science and Technology (ICERECT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
4. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Artificial intelligence risk management framework: Generative artificial intelligence profile.
5. Li, P., & Zhang, L. (2025). Application of big data technology in enterprise information security management. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 1022.
6. Selvamuthu, C. M., Yerasuri, S. S., Manukonda, K. R. R., SnvRamanamurthy, B., Kwatra, C. V., & Hemalatha, P. K. (2025, November). IoT Detection and Authentication Using Machine Learning: A Cybersecurity Perspective. In 2025 International Conference on Emerging Engineering Technologies and Applications (IC-EETA) (pp. 417-422). IEEE.
7. From COBIT to ISO 42001: Evaluating cybersecurity frameworks for opportunities, risks, and regulatory compliance in commercializing large language models. (2024). Computers & Security, 144, Article 103964.
8. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 33–44).
9. Yalakaturi, S. N. (2025). AI-DRIVEN DATA OBSERVABILITY FOR RESILIENT DATA CENTER OPERATIONS. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(5s), 1589-1602.
10. Mökander, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: Nature, scope, and limitations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, Article 44.
11. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). The NIST cybersecurity framework (CSF) 2.0.
12. Mahadevan, S. (2025). DRIVING SUSTAINABILITY IN AUTO & MANUFACTURING SECTORS: THE ROLE OF CLOUD-BASED SERVERLESS AUTOMATION FOR ERP SYSTEMS. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(7s), 1813-1825.
13. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection—Information security management systems—Requirements (ISO/IEC 27001:2022).
14. International Organization for Standardization. (2023). Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Management system (ISO/IEC 42001:2023).
15. Rohit Gorle. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Access Risk Detection in Cloud Identity and Access Management Systems. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research , 241–252. Retrieved from https://jicrcr.com/index.php/jicrcr/article/view/3833
16. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations (NIST Special Publication 800-53, Revision 5).
17. Bandi, V. D. V. K. AI-Based Anomaly Detection Frameworks in Distributed Enterprise Data Systems.
18. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Risk management framework for information systems and organizations: A system life cycle approach for security and privacy (NIST Special Publication 800-37, Revision 2).
19. AGENTIC AI FOR ENTERPRISE CLOUD OPERATIONS: AUTOMATION, GOVERNANCE, AND SECURITY RISKS. (2025). Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(S6), 9758-9770. https://doi.org/10.52152/by3w0j46
20. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2022). Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence (NIST Special Publication 1270).
21. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2021). ENISA threat landscape 2021.
22. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2022). ENISA threat landscape 2022.
23. Reddy Manukonda, K. R. (2023). Investigating the role of exploratory testing in agile software development: a case study analysis. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2(4), 1-5.
24. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023). ENISA threat landscape 2023.
25. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2024). ENISA threat landscape 2024.
26. Financial Stability Board. (2023). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence.
27. Kolla , S. K. (2025). Generative AI-Enabled Precision Medicine Framework For Longitudinal EHR Intelligence and Personalized Clinical Decision Support. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN SIGNAL AND IMAGE SCIENCES, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.29284/kcgr6k25
28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market.
29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system.
30. World Economic Forum. (2023). Global cybersecurity outlook 2023.
31. Rohit Gorle. (2024). Deep Learning Approaches for Threat Detection in Multi-Cloud Environments. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications (JoCAAA), 33(07), 3857–3864. Retrieved from https://eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub/article/view/5879
32. World Economic Forum. (2024). Global cybersecurity outlook 2024.
33. World Economic Forum. (2025). Global cybersecurity outlook 2025.
34. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2023). Achieving effective internal control over sustainability reporting.
35. International Organization for Standardization. (2021). Risk management—Guidelines (ISO 31000:2018).
36. International Organization for Standardization. (2020). Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection—Guidelines for privacy impact assessment (ISO/IEC 29134:2017).
37. International Organization for Standardization. (2022). Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection—Guidelines for information security risk management (ISO/IEC 27005:2022).
38. Movva, V. R. (2025). GENERATIVE AI-DRIVEN DEVOPS: LEVERAGING LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS FOR INTELLIGENT SOFTWARE DELIVERY AND ENGINEERING PRODUCTIVITY IN RETAIL ENTERPRISES. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 38(2s), 1621-1631.
39. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0): Playbook.
40. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2020). ENISA threat landscape 2020.
41. International Organization for Standardization. (2024). Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Guidance on risk management (ISO/IEC 23894:2023).
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rama Chandra Rao Nampalli, Carlos Fernnadez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
- Share: copy and redistribute the material
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to
the original author(s) and source.
Full license text: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
